10-06-2005, 07:18 PM
Pierre,
I understand the differences between simulation and reality, however that's the beauty of it. My simulator allows me to practice
things I can't do in real life. It's a much more laid back and relaxed atmosphere (wait till you try FSP though!... lol)
And to Big Vern; ILS approaches are a "standard" but that's about all they are. Normally, in good weather we'll fly a visual approach
using the ILS as reference if necessary and available. Pilots (at my airline at least) don't always like letting the AP do the work for them,
and I'd say that 75% of approaches are hand flown from the FAF or earlier, with equipment like ILS, VOR, NDB, etc. used to back up the
pilot in his visual navigation. Personally, I'll only use the AP Approach mode if I expect a bumpy approach, or can't see the runway at the
initiation of the approach. Hand flying landings is good practice, and makes sure our pilots don't become too dependent on the AP.
I enjoy answering questions, and if anyone has any, don't hesitate to ask.
I understand the differences between simulation and reality, however that's the beauty of it. My simulator allows me to practice
things I can't do in real life. It's a much more laid back and relaxed atmosphere (wait till you try FSP though!... lol)
And to Big Vern; ILS approaches are a "standard" but that's about all they are. Normally, in good weather we'll fly a visual approach
using the ILS as reference if necessary and available. Pilots (at my airline at least) don't always like letting the AP do the work for them,
and I'd say that 75% of approaches are hand flown from the FAF or earlier, with equipment like ILS, VOR, NDB, etc. used to back up the
pilot in his visual navigation. Personally, I'll only use the AP Approach mode if I expect a bumpy approach, or can't see the runway at the
initiation of the approach. Hand flying landings is good practice, and makes sure our pilots don't become too dependent on the AP.
I enjoy answering questions, and if anyone has any, don't hesitate to ask.