[Closed] A quand une évolution du logiciel

[incair]

Il y a longtemps que j’utilise FS passengers avec FS9,,je crois même faire partie des premiers utilisateurs dès sa sortie,
un programme
dont je ne pourrais plus me passer. Malheureusement je trouve qu’il n’a pas du tout évolué, ce qui est dommage.
Quelques exemples d’évolutions qui auraient été souhaitables :
-Comme il est possible de choisir les zones dangereuses à cause des conflits il aurait été bien de pouvoir choisir des zones
à risques
aviaires selon certains degrés suivant les saisons.
- la possibilité de prévoir des aéroports de déroutement dans la préparation des vols, et en cours de vol de manière
aléatoire déclarer
une urgence médicale, ou une panne, et pouvoir se dérouter le plus rapidement possible, comme dans la réalité.
- la possibilité de choisir plutôt que le temps de vol, un horaire d’arrivée comme cela était dans la première version, et
ainsi pouvoir
jouer sur les vitesses pour arriver à destination.
- lors des maintenances avions, bloquer celui-ci le temps nécessaire et pouvoir faire appel à un avion de location avec ou sans
équipage. Avec un coût en conséquence pour la compagnie.
-La possibilité d’acheter l’avion à crédit, ou en leasing, ou encore de le louer.
-la possibilité choisir un copilote qui prendrait également de la promotion au fur et à mesure des vols.
- un autre petit truc. Lier directement le numéro de vol inscrit dans FSpassengers dans l’ATC d’FS9
Rien que des petites améliorations qui rendraient ce super logiciel encore plus vivant et passionnant.
Vu le travail de base qu’a fournit notre développeur Daniel Polli, je pense qu’il pourrait faire cet effort quitte à payer
un petit supplément
pour son travail.
merci

[flyingleaf]

Eh?

[whiskey-zulu]

In English please. You won't be answered if you use other languages - this is clearly stated in the Forum Rules.

[incair]

A long time ago I use FS9 with FS passengers, I think even be among the first users since its release, a program
I could not live without me. Unfortunately I do not think he's changed everything, which is a shame.
Some examples of changes that would have been desirable:
-As it is possible to choose the dangerous conflict zones because it would have been nice to choose high-risk areas
avian according to some degree depending on the season.
- The possibility of providing diversion airports in flight planning and in-flight randomly declare
a medical emergency, or a failure, and to divert as soon as possible, as in reality.
- A choice rather than the time of flight as an arrival time was in the first version, and thus be able
play speeds to reach its destination.
- During aircraft maintenance, block it the time and able to call on an aircraft rental with or without
crew. With a cost for the company accordingly.
-The possibility of buying the aircraft on credit or lease, or to rent.
-the possibility to choose a copilot who also take the promotion As flights.
- Another little trick. Directly link the flight number falls within FsPassengers in FS9 ATC
Nothing but small improvements that would make it even more super lively and exciting software.
Given the work provides our developer base than Daniel Polli, I think it could make the effort to leave a small charge
for his work.
thank you

But French and spainish are oficial language in aeronautic

[whiskey-zulu]

1) Already in the program if you look deep enough.
2) Not going to happen.
3) Just don't fill in the arrival time, but be prepared to be penalised for using time accelaration.
4) Not going to happen
5) Not going to happen
6) Already in the program: use Flight sim callsign option instead of FSP callsign option.

English is the official language of these forums, as was put down by DanSteph, the forum administrator who lives somewhere in Continental Europe.

[incair]

1) Yes, but not at all realistic in random fashion, then it would be easy to write a few extra lines in the program for it to work as risk areas.
2) damage
3) ridiculous, while the option existed in the first version, and Dan at the time I was assured that reinstates the option.
4) damage
5) damage
6) fake it does not work and never worked.

And for all which is a shame, a software which does not change at the request of its users eventually die and disappear.

Language for the first mail that I had shared with Dan in his time were French, and I am against the dictatorship of the English language

attentamente

[whiskey-zulu]

1) Just make seasonal maps in the FSP map editor. Quite simple really.
2) Been discussed too many times for me to remember, and Dan even refused to add it when he was active here.
3) Still not going to happen, and this was changed due to popular demand.
4) Been discussed and turned down before.
5) Been discussed and turned down before.
6) It does work, and has always worked. Plenty of people here use that option without issues.

What language you share with Dan in e-mail is between you and Dan. Here on the forums, English has been set down as the primary language to be used,
as it is technically the Official ICAO Language.

Dan has, for all intents and purposes shelved FSP and FSPX. There is not going to be any further development of either unless he miraculously
re-appears and says that there is going to be.