RIDICULOUS!

[Jetflyer]

jetBlue220 wrote:
I know perfectly well what LR means.

It's range is not over 10,000 nm.

Extending the range of the market-leading 777 family by more than 1,500 nautical miles (2,775 kilometers), the 777-200LR (Longer Range) allows
airlines to service nonstop routes such as New York-Singapore and Los Angeles-Dubai at full passenger capacity and carry revenue cargo. The 777-200LR
can carry 301 passengers up to 9,420 nautical miles (17,446 kilometers).

- From Boeing's website, which you told me to look at. http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2005...0215g.html

And, what I said about being realistic. You have FSP, which IS as realistic as possible.. so, you're trying to do something that is unrealistic, and
then complaining that it can't be done..

Also.. You had 376 passengers. Based on above, the 9420 nm range is based on 301 passengers.

That's the real 777. In the real one they operate it at Mach 0.84 and starting at lower altitudes. Because this is a flight sim and I can do what I
want, I can reduce the cruising speed and climb to higher altitudes earlier. Difference is that it would be unsafe in reality and not worth the risk.
But you could actually do this and extend the range to what I flew. So it still isn't unrealistic if you pushed the real plane to its limits. And try
telling in the designer of this 777 that his FDE is unrealistic. It is the most realistic available and fuel flow is also realistic depending on the
conditions you operate it in. I'd like to seeyou design a 777-200LR FDE from scratch and get everything as realistic as you can. Ands alsol when did
anyone say that any aircraft is as realstiic as it gets? Even PMDG planes aren't 100% realstic. Nothing is, this is FS2004, and although you say
FSPassengers is realstic, it is to a point, but you cannot argue it is 100% realistic Evidence in opposition to this would include:

1) Passengers hunger levels are not realistic
2) Some announcements arent realistic as compared to real operations
3) The first officer would actually communicate emergencies to the control tower if it was 100% realistic but this is a limitation of FS2004

It is down to things like this that no AIRCRAFT or FSPASSENGERS can be 100% realistic.



Post Edited ( 06-18-06 16:37 )

[Jetflyer]

Hey also there was no problem with keeping the 35 pax happy with food and drink on the 22 hour demo flight the real 777-200LR did.

[Drew]

glad to see the link in your sig

[DanSteph]

Jetflyer wrote:
Fing hell don't take it so seriously. Sarcasm is an unnecessary and unfunny tactic.

Offensive title and writing is also an unnecessary tactic.
I back up drew 100% he do a fine job here.

Dan

[DeCarvalho]

lol...i like the title of the post...RIDICULOUS!...it really portraits the talking in it!!! LOLOLOL

[Jetflyer]

DeCarvalho wrote:
lol...i like the title of the post...RIDICULOUS!...it really portraits the talking in it!!! LOLOLOL

Why the hell do you think you need to reply to the topic if yo are only going to flame? That's more ridiculous. Grow up.

[WBHoenig]

If you don't like how something is done, you shouldn't be whining like this unless you are willing to help program it. You should think about
spending a year with zero income whatsoever, working probably eighteen hour days, making sixty thousand lines of code work, programming the best FS addon there is. Then you might appreciate what FsP does have.



Post Edited ( 06-18-06 20:36 )

[Jetflyer]

I appreciate what it has a lot already actually. More than anyone else I would say. remember I am the No1 user of this, with over 600 flights, if I thought it sucked I would have removed it from my system ages ago. In fact I'm doing an FSP flight NOW I did one EARLIER and LAST NIGHT and every day for that matter. So don't balk about me not appreciating it. I wouldn't mind helping program it at all but I need source code to start don't I.



Post Edited ( 06-18-06 20:42 )

[jetBlue220]

WBHoenig wrote:
If you don't like how something is done, you shouldn't be whining like this unless you are willing to help program it. You should think about
spending a year with zero income whatsoever, working probably eighteen hour days, making sixty thousand lines of code work, programming the best FS
addon there is. Then you might appreciate what FsP does have.

[Jetflyer]

jetBlue220 wrote:

WBHoenig wrote:
If you don't like how something is done, you shouldn't be whining like this unless you are willing to help program it. You should think about
spending a year with zero income whatsoever, working probably eighteen hour days, making sixty thousand lines of code work, programming the best FS
addon there is. Then you might appreciate what FsP does have.

You should shut up you moron.

btw, I don't care sod it i wasn't complaining just letting off some steam which is a natural human response and I also was quite humorous to start with but nobody here has a sense of humor and all I get to start wth is disrespect because all of you are losers with too much time to wank and play fs2004. Well when my "20hr flight" is going on autopilot i only takeoff and land in between I do other things so don't think i have too much time on my hands. You people have a problem and it isn 't me (well it clearly is for you). because you can't accepet someone different to yourselves.



Post Edited ( 06-18-06 22:18 )

[Drew]

when you say we are ALL losers, are you refering to every member on here, or just certain ones in particular?

[Jetflyer]

People who highlight what others have said and then insert a stupid clapping smilie to make it seem like they are in my defiance is one thing, and
those who just are irritating and question me without giving answers what's the point in that? As for my point that was pretty valid. And I just get
crap.

[jetBlue220]

Oh, I was just agreeing with Will.

What did you want answered? I gave you my opinion, as did other people.. then you went on saying how the 777 can go over 10,000 nm and such, yet I
proved you wrong.. etc.

And, don't go calling us losers. Especially when you were just bragging a little while ago how much better you are, 'cause you've flown more than
anybody else.. that obviously shows that you spend more time playing the game than we do. I'm not saying this is a bad thing, just don't go calling us
losers because of it.

[DanSteph]

Jetflyer wrote:
I appreciate what it has a lot already actually. More than anyone else I would say. remember I am the No1 user of this, with over 600
flights, if I thought it sucked I would have removed it from my system ages ago..

Very glad to hear that.

Now take 1 minutes my shoes :

You worked 3000 hours for something with all your earth and someone
roughly bash it and qualify it as ridiculous and rant against it with bad word.

This forum is the living proof that I can accept criticism as I almost never cut post
even if they might have a negative impact on my work, the one that feed my familly.
You perhaps love FsP but someone that read your post might feel that it's not
your opinion and that FsP suck. Many thanks !

So today I started to wonder why I should accept here what i'm not accepting
in all my others freeware forum ie: bad word and rough bashing ?

Me, my work and all the support team deserve at least the same respect than
anyone else. We are not dog. If you want an answer or help please post
with another tone. This is not specifically for you but you will be the first to
experiment the new policy:

Rough bashing name calling or any lack of respect in post are not allowed
here anymore, such post will be closed or even deleted. I can accept critisism
but NOT lack of respect and rough bashing.

Regards,

Dan

Thread closed !



Post Edited ( 06-19-06 02:15 )