Brake Failure in FS, but Not FSP

[poden]

I had landed on a short runway, only to realize that the brakes weren't working. I only found out the brakes weren't working until too late, and I ran
off the end of the runway at about 30 knots. Everything was OK, and the plane bounced safely to a stop. Then I realized the brake failure was caused
by FS and not FSP (the co-pilot didn't say anything about a brake failure). So I guess that means FSP doesn't capture simulated failures from FS, is
that correct?

[Drew]

correct

FsP only recognises its own built in failures

[Drew]

and here comes another FAQ - (awaits for jetflyer to moan at me for typing the letters FAQ in a post)

http://www.fspassengers.com/?action=faq&question=21

[poden]

Aha, good "FAQuage" as usual, Drew. Yeah I took a quick look through the FAQs, but didn't see that. Good stuff to know, thanks!

[Jetflyer]

Drew wrote:
and here comes another FAQ - (awaits for jetflyer to moan at me for typing the letters FAQ in a post)

http://www.fspassengers.com/?action=faq&question=21

Honestly, I only complained about it when you directed someone to the FAQ for a problem that the FAQ doesn't cover.

On failures, a failure happened on the Level-D 767 and I thought it was caused by its inbuilt failure generator, got penalised for not declaring
emergency; it'd been caused by FSP but sometimes it's hard to know. We've all been there (several times if you've got over 2,000 hours!). I should
know all the answers considering my devotion to this program! LOL!

[Drew]

Jetflyer wrote:


Honestly, I only complained about it when you directed someone to the FAQ for a problem that the FAQ doesn't cover.

if you read the post, you will find the FAQ does cover the problem

i dont just say FAQ to everything, i only say it if there is a reply within the FAQ

if there is no FAQ about the problem

eg,

http://www.fspassengers.com/forum/showth...p?tid=6344

i will give an answer



Post Edited ( 06-03-06 00:09 )

[Jetflyer]

Drew wrote:

Jetflyer wrote:


Honestly, I only complained about it when you directed someone to the FAQ for a problem that the FAQ doesn't cover.

if you read the post, you will find the FAQ does cover the problem

i dont just say FAQ to everything, i only say it if there is a reply within the FAQ

if there is no FAQ about the problem

eg,

http://www.fspassengers.com/forum/showth...p?tid=6344

i will give an answer

i'm not talking about this thread, I was refering to the one where someone had a problem with their numbers going minus



Post Edited ( 06-03-06 01:05 )

[poden]

"All your FAQs are belong to us"

"Holy FAQ Batman, just check the FAQ!"

[Drew]

Jetflyer wrote:

i'm not talking about this thread, I was refering to the one where someone had a problem with their numbers going minus

yes and there is a FAQ about this problem, as i have said 3 times now - the FAQ was even posted into that thread.

Cant you get that into your head???

if someone writes a problem, and there is a FAQ, i will tell them to go look in there (eg, minus points), if there is no FAQ for the problem - what would be the point of telling them to look there?



Post Edited ( 06-03-06 09:24 )