03-10-2006, 05:15 AM
I have a worse system that than and had no problem with loading any scenery; the tree's loaded instantly as with traffic. My only problem
was my 15FPS, which, is actually a step up from FS9 in which I averaged 9. The water textures, feal, everything is superb; I don't see how
people can say flight dynamics have not been touched. If so, Than why does touching the ground and lifting off feel so different than in
fs9? I don't know about all of you, but I actually like it-- better FPS than I'm getting in FS9 with better scenery and a nice feel to the default
planes? Plus movable jetways, trucks, you name it!.. Well, Microsoft atleast pleased one customer this release!
Anyone try a payware aircraft in the newer demo? Things get so messed up your inclined to laugh at it.
was my 15FPS, which, is actually a step up from FS9 in which I averaged 9. The water textures, feal, everything is superb; I don't see how
people can say flight dynamics have not been touched. If so, Than why does touching the ground and lifting off feel so different than in
fs9? I don't know about all of you, but I actually like it-- better FPS than I'm getting in FS9 with better scenery and a nice feel to the default
planes? Plus movable jetways, trucks, you name it!.. Well, Microsoft atleast pleased one customer this release!
Anyone try a payware aircraft in the newer demo? Things get so messed up your inclined to laugh at it.
- - - - -
Embry Riddle Aeronautical Student.
Embry Riddle Aeronautical Student.
![[-]](http://www.fspassengers.com/forum/images/collapse.png)