22-08-2005, 11:47 PM
I tried UT and for me it's not so great, sorry. I don't see why I should pay for something I can get for free (and really PAI is the same) and
not even get any traffic at airports without custom AFCAD files (which are quite a lot), not to speak of military and GA traffic...
But all products have their pros and cons, as I pointed out above. If you want a good-looking, easy to use AI traffic solution, UT surely is a good
choice.
I just want a bit more than that and can live without the nice user interface (I hope
).
Besides I've already owned Mytraffic2004 for a long time, and extending it with PAI is the logical choice over buying yet another traffic solution, I
think.
not even get any traffic at airports without custom AFCAD files (which are quite a lot), not to speak of military and GA traffic...
But all products have their pros and cons, as I pointed out above. If you want a good-looking, easy to use AI traffic solution, UT surely is a good
choice.
I just want a bit more than that and can live without the nice user interface (I hope
).Besides I've already owned Mytraffic2004 for a long time, and extending it with PAI is the logical choice over buying yet another traffic solution, I
think.
![[-]](http://www.fspassengers.com/forum/images/collapse.png)