12-01-2007, 10:55 AM
Not sure if anyone has tried them, but I've just tried buying an Aero Commander AC500, 560 and 680. All of them come up as Bad
Choice and Terrible Choice.
Choice and Terrible Choice.
![[Image: 11552.png]](http://www.tsviewer.com/promotion/dynamic_sig/sig.php/clan_fs/11552.png)
![[Image: sigstu.gif]](http://www.simpilots.co.uk/FSP/sigstu.gif)
Thread Rating:
|
Aero Commander's
|
12-01-2007, 03:32 PM
Only because of total time on airframe being very high. As a personal choice I find them excellent aircraft. Descent speed and range, and
in my game AVGAS is cheaper than Jet A, so economical as well. ![[Image: ualsigfinal.gif]](http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e156/politika1941/ualsigfinal.gif)
12-01-2007, 05:10 PM
They work well in FSP, and the Milton Shupe ACs are VERY NICE. The FSP text saying they're "high priced" or a "bad choice" is pretty much worthless.
I never pay attention to it. 
300,000 km/sec. Its not just a good idea, its the law.
16-01-2007, 05:33 PM
yep managed to get some repaints done on them for my VA and the guys seem to love them for Bush operations
17-01-2007, 01:44 AM
The ac500vc1.zip file at Avsim is very much a "go-to" plane. I keep one is just about every fleet I have.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
![[-]](http://www.fspassengers.com/forum/images/collapse.png)
![[Image: vpa401.png]](http://www.virtualpilots.org/public/images/signatures/vpa401.png)
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)